Posts tagged scientist.

How I’m rushing through this! How much each sentence in this brief story contains. “The stars are made of the same atoms as the earth.” I usually pick one small topic like this to give a lecture on. Poets say science takes away from the beauty of the stars — mere globs of gas atoms. Nothing is “mere.” I too can see the stars on a desert night, and feel them. But do I see less or more? The vastness of the heavens stretches my imagination — stuck on this carousel my little eye can catch one-million-year-old light. A vast pattern — of which I am a part — perhaps my stuff is was belched from some forgotten star, as one is belching there. Or see them with the greater eye of Palomar, rushing all apart from some common starting point when they were perhaps all together. What is the pattern, or the meaning, or the /why/? It does not do harm to the mystery to know a little about it. For far more marvelous is the truth than any artists of the past imagined! Why do the poets of the present not speak of it? What men are poets who can speak of Jupiter if he were like a man, but if he is an immense spinning sphere of methane and ammonia, must be silent?

Richard Feynman, Six Easy Pieces, 59-60, footnote. via { olena }

••••••

Reblogging, from “1 year ago on June 07, 2011”.

I like that hurri[k]anes reblogged this, and tsunamis followed. :D

(via tsunamis)

But if he is indeed mad, then he has some reason for being so. If you will take my advice, gentlemen, you will not worry about it.”

There was a short silence while the Ministers puzzled this out. “You mean to say he might have become mad deliberately?” said one in an incredulous tone.

“Nothing is more likely,” said the Duke.

“But why?” asked another.

“I have not the least idea. In the Peninsula we learnt not to question him. Sooner or later it would become clear that all his incomprehensible and startling actions were part of his magic. Keep him to his task, but shew no surprize at any thing he does. That, my lords, is the way to manage a magician.

Susanna Clarke, Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell

and scholars, madam … are the most selfish beings in creation and think that devotion to their researches excuses any thing…

Susanna Clarke, Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell

He understood for the first time that the world is not dumb at all, but merely waiting for someone to speak to it in a language it understands. In the fairy’s song the earth recognized the names by which it called itself.

Susanna Clarke, Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell

Well, I suppose one ought not to employ a magician and then complain that he does not behave like other people…

Susanna Clarke, Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell

[…] the way scientists work is more like: Fiddle Around, Find Something Weird, Retest It, It Doesn’t Happen a Second Time, Get Distracted Trying to Make It Happen Again, Go to Chipotle, Recall the Original Purpose of Your Research, Start Over, Apply for Funding for a Better Instrument, Publish Some Interim Fluff, Learn That Someone Has Scooped You, Take Your Lab in a New Direction, Apply for Funding for the New Direction, Collaborate With an Icelandic Poet, Eat Chipotle With an Icelandic Poet, Co-Write Scientifically Accurate Ode to Walrus, Get Interested in Something Unrelated, Apply for Funding for Something Unrelated, Notice That 20 Years Have Passed.

Dispelling 8 popular culture myths about scientists: Thick Books and Thin Films (via scipsy)

(via scipsy)

A Deathbed Story I Would Never Tell ›

We all tell stories. That’s how we share. That’s how we remember. Storytelling is what humans do. It’s part of our nature — but natures, I’ve noticed, differ. I am not a scientist. I don’t have a mind for what they do, which is to stick, doggedly, to hard facts, keeping emotion out of the room. It’s a discipline for them, a way of being, that makes them, well, scientists.

Here he is, describing a moment of enormous significance, and he won’t allow a Signifier.

(via physicsphysics)

Bern Porter, Score 8

via { Spore }