Posts tagged biology.

It was just amazing to me that you could have a little more or less of some chemical and your whole worldview would be different,” he recalls, smiling with boyish wonder. “If you can switch a chemical and your personality changes, who are you?

The $1.3B Quest to Build a Supercomputer Replica of a Human Brain | Wired Science | Wired.com (via wildcat2030)

Yes! But not only part of your personality. Chemicals are intertwined within systems, so there’s no such thing as a gene-for-this-or-that-alone. Change your mind, change your body.

Braintrust contains a lot of interesting information about this.

(via wildcat2030)

You can all supply your own favorite, most nauseating examples of the commodification of love. Mine include the wedding industry, TV ads that feature cute young children or the giving of automobiles as Christmas presents, and the particularly grotesque equation of diamond jewelry with everlasting devotion. The message, in each case, is that if you love somebody you should buy stuff. A related phenomenon is the ongoing transformation, courtesy of Facebook, of the verb ‘to like’ from a state of mind to an action that you perform with your computer mouse: from a feeling to an assertion of consumer choice. And liking, in general, is commercial culture’s substitution for loving.

Jonathan Franzen (via the-lone-pamphleteer)

••••••

But Jonathan Franzen is looking at love/like/etc. in very socio-culturally accepted ways. Accepted does not mean true, nor does it mean untrue. It means we have an “image” of what “love” should be — an idealization. The image we have of Love is placed on such a high pedestal, that we don’t dare think of it in any other way. And that unwillingness to think differently is wrong. (Except, I’m being silly, because I think unwillingness to dissent is also a phenomenon with roots in biology and evolutionary fitness. Group-think is totally necessary for survival, thus desired.)

Our image of Love is based solely on cultural tradition, trusted because of Time. Trusting that something is true solely on the basis that it’s been accepted for longer than we can fathom, is a fallacy.

Let’s think of it another way: what we know to be Love is just an expression of biological bonding / cooperation that was selected for since it worked well to proliferate the species. Bonding and cooperation — we’re probably more OK with commodification of those things because they’re already on less of a pedestal than Love. They already seem more mundane. Our alarms aren’t going off. And doesn’t it make sense that cooperation between kith (and kin) is based on commodities? Based on assets? It was always about that.

Go play the iPhone game, Osmos. The objective is “Become Bigger”. That’s what life does, at very basic levels. And to do that, it requires assets in the forms of food and children, and it needs resources to obtain food to have children, to become bigger, to multiply.

Sure, that seems reductionist and maybe even “ugly”, but is it really? From that perspective — if you allow yourself to entertain the thought, not even believe it, but just entertain it — doesn’t it make sense that “love” would be “commodified”? It’s just showing up in a different way than we’ve seen before. It’s not some “evil” of the modern, technological age. It’s just an evolution of what always was.

I’m not saying any of the above is factual/certain — just something to consider and break out of the band-wagon a bit. Because my genes are all wrong and I’m probably not gonna multiply.

(via epistephilia)

Reductionism vs Emergent Laws

Biologists, Neuroscientists,

Hypothetically, what would you say to someone asking the “chicken or egg” question about neural chemistry: Does neurologocal/chemical/genetic information precede personality/responses/disposition or is it simply an expression of metaphysical “events”?

For example, those who believe in soul or karma and reincarnation, usually are more partial to the latter answer. For them, “chemistry” cannot possibly add up to the complex phenomenon they witness, therefore they accept the metaphysical answers more readily.

For a scientist, there may be other reasons to question “what came first,” but a metaphysical preference isn’t one of them. I wonder how valid the question is right now, for the scientific community.

It seems to me that we don’t yet know exactly how things add up to what we witness, and yet Evolutionary theory gives tells us that things were not even as organized as this, before. So the idea that there are some metaphysical absolutes that govern behavior seems a little silly, seeing how much behavior has changed over centuries and how much it differs between species (so long as we don’t take the anthropocentric stance, and do value the “morality”/experience/behavioral patterns of other species instead of casting that information aside and believing the “humans are special and endowed” paradigm.)

But back to it — how would you answer?

Braintrust, by Patricia S. Churchland ›

I’m concerned about this one. Kindle actually has a maximum of highlights one can make per book (I only found out while reading Infinite Jest, after highlighting pages at a time; probably to prevent copying) and I think I might reach it for this one. It’s really good.

Trial by ordeal seemed to me, as I learned about it in school, ridiculously unfair. How could it have endured as an institution in Europe for hundreds of years?

The central idea was simple: with God’s intervention, innocence would plainly reveal itself, as the accused thief sank to the bottom of the pond, or the accused adulterer remained unburned by the red hot poker placed in his hand. Only the guilty would drown or burn. (For witches, the ordeal was less “forgiving”: if the accused witch drowned she was presumed innocent; if she bobbed to the surface, she was guilty, whereupon she was hauled off to a waiting fire.)

With time on our hands, my friend and I concocted a plan. She would falsely accuse me of stealing her purse, and then I would lay my hand on the stove and see whether it burned. We fully expected it would burn, and it did. So if the test was that obvious, how could people have trusted to trial by ordeal as a system of justice?

Braintrust, by Patricia S. Churchland

It did seem that likely Aristotle, Hume, and Darwin were right: we are social by nature. But what does that actually mean in terms of our brains and our genes? To make progress beyond the broad hunches about our nature, we need something solid to attach the claim to.

Braintrust, by Patricia S. Churchland

…they continued to grow — evidence of success. Mitalipov cancelled his holiday plans. “I was happy to spend Christmas culturing cells,” he says. “My family understood.

Shoukhrat Mitalipov, reproductive biology specialist

Human Stem Cells Created by Cloning
via Nature News

geveducation:

Screenshots from the updated and magnificent Powers of Minus Ten!

Get it at the app store.

Or download for PC/Mac.

Also, all-new teacher resources section of the POMT website.

*…and horrible feelings of “Damn why didn’t I make this?” set in.*

But honestly, looks great.

(via freshphotons)

Amazing Facts About Our Bodies

beben-eleben:

Swallow and Breathe

Fact: Humans are the only mammal that can’t swallow and breathe at the same time.

Every other mammal, and many other non-mammalian animals, can breathe while they eat. In fact, human infants are also able to do so, which lets them breathe while they nurse. We lose this ability around the age of 9 months, when our voice box drops as part of our development. As children and adults, the human voice box lays unusually low in the neck compared to other animals. This allows sound to resonate much more, which is why we are able to produce the wide range of sounds that makes up our speech.

Second Brain

Fact: You have a second brain in your gut.

Well, sort of. You have around 100 million neurons, more than are in your spinal cord, that line your gut from your esophagus to your anus. This is known to scientists as the enteric nervous system. This second brain is incapable of conscious thought and is largely responsible for digestion, but it does more than that. If you’ve ever felt “butterflies” in your stomach or felt as if you’ve been punched in the gut when receiving bad news, that was caused by your enteric nervous system. This also plays a roll in your overall mood, why certain foods can alter your mood and why bad situations or feelings often cause you to lose your appetite.

Loneliness

Fact: Loneliness is physically painful.

Ok, you probably knew that. But do you know why? Researchers at the University of California asked volunteers to play a computer game that simulated a simple game of catch with two other players. What they didn’t know was that the other “players” were just the computer and it was designed to leave them out after a few minutes of play, resulting in feelings of loneliness and rejection. They found that the feeling of loneliness is actually processed in the same part of your brain as physical pain, called the anterior cingulate cortex. This explains the human desire to fit in, to seek out companionship and helps to understand the power of peer pressure. Scientists are also hoping to use this information to help explain and treat some forms of depression.

Saliva

Fact: You salivate more before you vomit.

This is an automatic bodily reflex designed to protect your throat, mouth and teeth. Stomach acid is, of course, highly acidic and if it weren’t for the lining in your stomach it would eat a hole right through it. Unfortunately, you don’t have that same lining in your throat or mouth. Salivating before vomiting helps to dilute and rinse away the acid so it won’t harm the rest of your body. Your saliva can also help to neutralize the acid somewhat. This is also why it’s a good idea to rinse out your mouth and brush your teeth after you vomit.

Bitter Sweet

Fact: Cut yourself? Put sugar on it!

Healers in Africa have been putting crushed sugar cane on wounds for generations. Moses Murandu is a nurse who grew up watching his father use the remedy in Africa and was surprised to find that doctors in England didn’t use it. He started a study to research the idea, testing it on patients with bed sores, leg ulcers and amputations before dressing the wounds. They found that the sugar can reduce pain and kill bacteria that slow healing. Sugar is hygroscopic, meaning it naturally absorbs water which the bacteria need to survive. Sugar is also much cheaper than more modern antibiotics. So the next time you cut yourself, give it a sprinkle of sugar before putting on a band-aid!

Forgetful

Fact: Forget why you walked into a room? There is a reason.

Have you ever walked into a room and forgot why you were there? And after that, have you ever noticed that you can sometimes remember if you go back through the doorway? There is actually a reason for that. Researchers in Notre Dame conducted several experiments on rooms and their effect on memory. Subjects in the study were divided into two groups and given a simple task while traveling the same distance. The only difference is one group went through a doorway and the other didn’t. They found that people who traveled through the doorway were three times more likely to forget their task. Researchers concluded that our mind perceives doorways as “event boundaries” and that decisions you made in that room are “stored” there when you leave. That is also why you can remember if you go back into that room.

Color Vision

Fact: Some woman actually see more colors.

Frustrated because you told your hubby to bring your peach shirt and he grabbed a pink one? It might not be his fault. A study from the University of California shows that up to 50% of women carry four types of color receptors, or iodopsins, rather than the usual three. Normal visioned people will look at a rainbow and see seven different colors, while one with four receptors will see around 10 colors. The reason this happens in woman is that the red and green receptors are located on the X chromosome, while the blue is on the Y. The red and green receptors can be slightly shifted allowing for a greater range of color vision. There are also a small number of women who will have both kinds of red and green, resulting in 5 color receptors. This is also why color blindness is much more common in men than women.

Boogers

Fact: Eating your boogers may been good for you!

Your nasal mucus (booger) is designed to filter out airborne contaminants and so eating it has long thought to be bad for you, but recent study shows that it may actually help to boast your immune system by introducing those contaminants in small amounts, training your body to recognize and fight against them. But don’t worry, you don’t have to start picking your nose. You have most likely already eaten your boogers, even if you are unaware of it. Mucus accumulated in your nasal passages is often directed backwards and down your throat by the motion of your cilia (hair like structures on your cells used to move things). Yum…

Redundant Nostril

Fact: You probably only breath through one nostril at a time.

This happens in about 85% of people. The truly interesting thing about that is in those people the body with automatically switch between nostrils every four hours or so, although it can vary based on body position, illness or just from person to person. This is accomplished through erectile tissue in your nose similar to that in a penis or clitoris. The erectile tissue will slowly swell up in one nostril, eventually blocking most of it while the tissue in the other one will shrink, allowing for more air flow. It has been found that which side you are breathing from can have an effect on your body. If you are breathing from the right side, for example, your blood glucose levels will rise and you will use much more oxygen. Also, breathing through the right will cause higher activity in the left side of your brain and vise versa. This could be useful in stimulating your right (creative) side or your left (logical) side as needed.

Blood Vessels

Fact: Every pound of fat gained causes your body to make 7 new miles of blood vessels.

Knowing this, it’s easy to see why obesity and heart disease often go together. Most of the new blood vessels are tiny capillaries, but also include small veins and arteries. This means if you are “only” 10 pounds overweight your heart has to pump blood through an extra 70 miles of blood vessels. The good news is that this also works in reverse. If you lose a pound of fat, your body will break down and reabsorb the no longer needed blood vessels. This is encouraging to dieters, as one pound does not seem like a lot to lose, but even that little bit of difference will result in a large benefit for your heart!

©List Verse

These beautiful petri-dish-babies are the product of oocytes, or immature eggs, derived in vitro from induced pluripotent stem cells.

via ScienceNOW.

••••••

P.S.
I’m sure I don’t need to mention this as it’s likely all of your political affiliations are fairly homogenous and similar to mine if you’re following me, but please don’t forget to cast a vote this November 6th, otherwise research like this is at risk of losing funding — the Republican side is definitely against IVF.

{ How synthetic biology will change the world }

For example: scientists routinely wield microbes against disease, using computers to turn bacteria into microscopic drug factories rapidly assembled from off-the-shelf biological parts; crops ease world hunger and convert sunlight into biomass; and the cells of astronauts remember if they’ve been damaged by gamma rays, alerting doctors before cancer starts to grow.

Image via { University of Washington }

Complexity is a property of living organisms at all scales, and synthetic biology may help scientists disentangle “Darwin’s bank”.

With all the things cancer is trying to do to kill our patient, how does it remember it is cancer?

Jay Bradner, a physician and chemical biologist

“…the answer lies in epigenetics, the programmes that manage the genome.”

Nature | News Feature
{ Cancer research: Open ambition }
Amy Maxmen
08 August 2012

••••••

Excellent inquisitiveness. Need moar like this.

{ TOKYU AGENCY }: TAG REACTION | RECRUIT 採用サイト |

••••••

Beautiful, simple web design & again, lovely code.
…or maybe I just like it because it looks a little { familiar }.

Photograph of blood & milk by { Frederic Fontenoy }, via { but does it float }

••••••

The liquids form tendrils, veins, cells, branches, { networks },
following { repeating orders } — how did this become?